I have to wonder if that ever would have held up in court. It seems pretty clear that for all the devices that record in H.264, the vendors did not do their due

I have to wonder if that ever would have held up in court. It seems pretty clear that for all the devices that record in H.264, the vendors did not do their due diligence to explain that the user did not have a license to distribute that video after 2015. And the whole concept is just patently absurd anyway, that file transfer infringes their patent when they've already been compensated for the encoder and decoder.