3 ms·
This is mostly about NixOS and not the Haskell experience (though some of this applies to that as well). TL;DR: I install a lot of packages to try them out and
by popinman322 9y ago
This is mostly about NixOS and not the Haskell experience (though some of this applies to that as well).
TL;DR: I install a lot of packages to try them out and want an easy way to roll them back with as few consequences as possible. Nix seems to fill that gap.
As a student this really appeals to me; I usually think in broad terms initially, maybe write a proof or two to make sure I'm doing what I think (read: hope) I'm doing. Implementation is an afterthought for me, and so when it finally comes time to implement something I'll usually start at the typical "what are my options" phase.
For domains that I'm strong in I have a good idea what's available and it's probably already installed. But sometimes you're just /new/ to something and need to try things out. Sure, an API seems good in theory, but how does it work out in practice? Too much boilerplate? Does it work well with everything else I want? Did/does the original author share similar use cases to me? Is it (well) maintained (still)?
Of course, by the end of this process any number of things could be installed; both things I asked for, and things I didn't, are available to me. The issue that I then run into, and that Nix seems to solve for me, is that I want to undo portions to the installation and all their unintended side-effects. Beyond that, an easy way to manage groups of packages and roll them back en masse (again, including unintended side-effects) would be so beautiful.
In the case of Haskell, I have created chroots just to keep Haskell penned away from the rest of my system. I don't need pacman yelling at me because I `cabal install`d something and now the owner is wrong, my hair is on fire, and the universe is imploding. Nix seems like a much better way to handle this.
Of course, I could just be naive and/or uninformed-- likely both. I'd welcome sage wisdom from Haskell programmers on how to properly, cleanly manage package installs without getting in trouble with the system package manager (short of creating packages myself). And I've no doubt this has been solved outside of Nix using methods beyond rigorous self-control.
- emj 9y agoThe mess you describe is only a problem if the products you produce suffer; chroots, virtualenvs and Snaps are a nice way to handle the resulting problem. If Nix really does make you more productive then sure this is a great way to solve this, but for me I would still have to convert that Nix environment to something shipable.
- popinman322 9y agoMaybe it's a personal thing. I really appreciate keeping my number of installed packages down, even when I have a lot of space available.
- nextos 9y agoYou can ship Dockers built with Nix. It's actually a great and quite popular combination.