5 ms·
Why not have three or ten co founders? All could bring value in different ways:
by wolco 9y ago
Why not have three or ten co founders? All could bring value in different ways:
- mooreds 9y agoHaha, I assume this was reductio ad absurdum. It's hard enough to make decisions and to align 2-4 co-founders, I can't imagine trying to make any kind of strategic (read, hard) decision with 10.
- wolco 9y agoYou would do what larger groups do and vote. Like a defacto board.
- mooreds 9y agoAh. Any group I've been a part of that was larger than 4 people wasn't making real decisions by vote. Instead, a smaller number of folks (1-3) would actually drive the decisions. Sometimes membership of that group rotated, but more often than not it was the same folks, with other occasionally dropping in to offer input, but not driving the decision in any meaningful manner. Perhaps I'm a cynic, but I believe that's how things operate--unless lines can be very clearly drawn (which is hard in a startup) a large number of decision makers will lead to no decisions.