There's a risk of being confused on how to do things with backwards compatiblity, but it's something that makes me like c# better than other languages. Being ab

There's a risk of being confused on how to do things with backwards compatiblity, but it's something that makes me like c# better than other languages. Being able to add new features without removing old features is great. Older examples of c# may look completely different than new examples but that is great because someone can continue without learning all the new stuff (kind of odd, but eh). Removing old functionality could doom them because they already have a lot of confusing dependencies when using part .net core, part .net 4.5. They don't support newer versions of .net on the old windows 10 versions, making support complete Hell as far as that is concerned. I think cleaning up documentation and old examples some would make the evolution of the language easier but isn't strictly necessary to still be useful. Even in strict enterprise, though it may be annoying.