I'm not the OP and don't have any solid examples off the top of my head, but I'm going to riff a little bit while I process the concept myself. It seems to me

I'm not the OP and don't have any solid examples off the top of my head, but I'm going to riff a little bit while I process the concept myself. It seems to me that by explicitly writing down the decision tree and reflecting on it, you could attempt to identify whether or not there were prejudices baked into it. As a contrived example based on the article and comments: should the fact that the patient is a 6-year-old girl vs. an overdosing opiate addict make any difference on whether or not the conditions you're flying in are safe? Or should it be based on visibility thresholds etc.