3 ms·
Perhaps it is part of the point, but the stigmatized narrative is no more correct according to the 4Q model than the sanctioned one. That is it appears to map '
by lsd5you 9y ago
Perhaps it is part of the point, but the stigmatized narrative is no more correct according to the 4Q model than the sanctioned one. That is it appears to map 'troglodytes' as morally virtuous. That is surely the correct narrative moves up and down the y-axis, and why can't that exist?
I struggle to put it into words, but for me the model has a koanic quality and is somewhat less of a clear insight than I initially thought it would be.
- phkahler 9y ago>> Perhaps it is part of the point, but the stigmatized narrative is no more correct according to the 4Q model than the sanctioned one. That is it appears to map 'troglodytes' as morally virtuous. Your first statement is often correct, the stigmatized narrative may not be "correct". But no-one is trying to say the 'troglodytes' are morally virtuous either, and suggesting that's what TFA is trying to claim would be it's own attack on the model. The whole point is that the model contains 4 types of people and the media will only allow for the existence to 2. Anyone that may have something valid to say that doesn't agree with the agenda is dumped into the lower left quadrant even though that may not be who they are.