3 ms·
That's amazing tech. Would lasers not be better suited for underground cutting for tunnels?
by rorykoehler 9y ago
That's amazing tech. Would lasers not be better suited for underground cutting for tunnels?
- static_noise 9y agoLasers would probably need a lot of energy to cut that much material. Can somebody do a quick analysis how much it would probably cost using conventional/water/lasers?
- larkeith 9y agoDo we even have the capacity to create sustained lasers with sufficient energy output to cut through solid rock?
- Faaak 9y agoActually they would vaporise the material, not cut it. So yeah, a lot of energy needed !
- louithethrid 9y agoIn addition you need a lot of fast air exchange to prevent vapor from building up. So the prize of addtional infrastructure is on laser.