I think the article mixes up and confuses two different concepts. One is that social media might amplify "normal" social conditions, such as bullying, to an un

I think the article mixes up and confuses two different concepts. One is that social media might amplify "normal" social conditions, such as bullying, to an unprecedented degree. The other one is the misuse/abuse of social media as socialization substitutes by children, leading to isolation. Social media can bring a lot of benefit to everyone, even children, if they are used to augment and improve our real-life, face-to-face interactions. But they cannot and should not substitute them. Some argue it's just about how you use them. That's not true. Companies like facebook use psychometrics, sociologist and psychologists to optimize their software for something, and that something probably never is your well-being. We can use regulation to enforce this. You can be the most active and social person there is, but a properly designed piece of software that filters and controls all your social interaction can destroy your social life and mental health. Especially if you're 9 years old and most of your life experiences come from a screen.