3 ms·

See e.g. Smerity reporting on Elon's talk in NIPS 2017: https://twitter.com/Smerity/status/938994837323259904 https://twitter.com/Smerity/status/938994837323259

by nora4 9y ago

See e.g. Smerity reporting on Elon's talk in NIPS 2017: https://twitter.com/Smerity/status/938994837323259904 https://twitter.com/Smerity/status/938994837323259904 as well as https://goo.gl/trX8SJ https://goo.gl/trX8SJ & https://goo.gl/aTMqv6 https://goo.gl/aTMqv6 What's your evidence for saying he does not say so? A bit mean of you to downvote without asking for evidence.

jacquesm 9y ago
You don't know who downvoted you and who did not.
- grzm 9y ago
  With the exception that it could not have been the person you replied to. (Or yourself, for completeness)
- nora4 9y ago
  I assumed akvadrako downvoted that since the vote and the comment appeared very close to each other and both right after my comment. But of course, I surely could be mistaken. And anyways, downvoting is not a big deal and they have the absolute right to do so. It's just that stating why you disagreed or downvoted would be helpful.
  - Gargoyle 9y ago
    I don't know if it's still true, but it used to be the case that if your reply to a comment your downvote to that comment does not count. It was a pretty clever mechanism in that you could be certain any downvotes didn't come from people replying to you.
  - arstin 9y ago
    I don’t see why HN doesn’t require every down vote to have a comment. Judging from the sheets of gray on most threads, most down voted comments aren’t actually in violation of site policy, off topic, trolling, etc. It’s just a few little people disagreed. Which is fine! But it’s not constructive or interesting to just slap the commenter with your dick.
    - TeMPOraL 9y ago
      Because then every other comment would have a stream of replies justifying the downvotes - replies which, presumably, would be regular comments, and thus susceptible to further downvotes (with comments)! In other words, this would be a huge noise generator.
akvadrako 9y ago
I don't see any evidence in your links; why don't you provide a quote? Asking me for evidence someone didn't say something is a bit absurd.

by nora4 9y ago

jacquesm 9y ago

You don't know who downvoted you and who did not.

grzm 9y ago
With the exception that it could not have been the person you replied to. (Or yourself, for completeness)
nora4 9y ago
I assumed akvadrako downvoted that since the vote and the comment appeared very close to each other and both right after my comment. But of course, I surely could be mistaken. And anyways, downvoting is not a big deal and they have the absolute right to do so. It's just that stating why you disagreed or downvoted would be helpful.
- Gargoyle 9y ago
  I don't know if it's still true, but it used to be the case that if your reply to a comment your downvote to that comment does not count. It was a pretty clever mechanism in that you could be certain any downvotes didn't come from people replying to you.
- arstin 9y ago
  I don’t see why HN doesn’t require every down vote to have a comment. Judging from the sheets of gray on most threads, most down voted comments aren’t actually in violation of site policy, off topic, trolling, etc. It’s just a few little people disagreed. Which is fine! But it’s not constructive or interesting to just slap the commenter with your dick.
  - TeMPOraL 9y ago
    Because then every other comment would have a stream of replies justifying the downvotes - replies which, presumably, would be regular comments, and thus susceptible to further downvotes (with comments)! In other words, this would be a huge noise generator.

akvadrako 9y ago

I don't see any evidence in your links; why don't you provide a quote? Asking me for evidence someone didn't say something is a bit absurd.