The fight over the meaning of "Open source" was lost by OSI almost two decades ago. Here's a 2002 version of their website essentially admitting as much: https

The fight over the meaning of "Open source" was lost by OSI almost two decades ago. Here's a 2002 version of their website essentially admitting as much: https://web.archive.org/web/20021001164015/http://www.opensource.org/docs/history.php https://web.archive.org/web/20021001164015/http://www.openso... >The OSI Certified mark is OSI's way of certifying that the license under which the software is distributed conforms to the OSD; the generic term "Open Source" cannot provide that assurance, but we still encourage use of the term "Open Source" to mean conformance to the OSD.