5 ms·
Numbers were done it's cheaper to run in the cloud nowdays, also VM ( EC2 on AWS ) have the same perf that baremetal. Have a read: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/in
by Thaxll 9y ago
Numbers were done it's cheaper to run in the cloud nowdays, also VM ( EC2 on AWS ) have the same perf that baremetal. Have a read: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/c5/ https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/c5/
- twic 9y ago> VM ( EC2 on AWS ) have the same perf that baremetal Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
- ApolloFortyNine 9y agoAWS makes $20 billion a year in revenue. Maybe it's possible that you're wrong?
- twic 9y agoThat is a complete non sequitur. AWS has traditionally never been the cheapest way to rent machine power, but people don't use it because it's cheap, they use it because it's easy to get started with a wide range of facilities without dedicated sysadmins.
- cthalupa 9y agohttp://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2017-11-29/aws-ec2-virtualization-2017.html http://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2017-11-29/aws-ec2-virtuali... Brendan Gregg has written here and elsewhere about the performance of VMs on EC2. Worth reading if you're interested in figuring out how close it is (or isn't).