3 ms·
As far as I understand, it all works in the local network. It shouldn't be too hard to create a server to translate its calls to the new api (that the smartphon
by egeozcan 9y ago
As far as I understand, it all works in the local network. It shouldn't be too hard to create a server to translate its calls to the new api (that the smartphone app uses), no?
edit: I don't understand why you'd down-vote this. I'd love to correct it if I said something blatantly wrong, just tell me. Also, I wasn't dismissing this as a non-problem, but rather questioning if there'd be an easy solution. My parents are also affected BTW.
- meschi 9y agoYes, but i don't think this is an option for the people complaining.
- egeozcan 9y agoI was asking to see if there's anything I'm missing. I was thinking about doing this myself. Sorry for not being clear - please see my edit.
- icebraining 9y agoMaybe. Apparently they use a non-standard wireless networking protocol called Sonosnet. They do have "bridges" to connect to a regular Wifi or ethernet network, but it's not clear to me if the CR100 can use those to connect to the speakers (and hence to the hypothetical "fake speaker" server). I'm sure all of this is reverse engineerable, but it might be less work to build everything from scratch :)