> And .. guile emacs hopefully one day I'm hoping for a Common Lisp emacs, myself. Scheme as specified just isn't a big enough language, and if you pick one o

> And .. guile emacs hopefully one day I'm hoping for a Common Lisp emacs, myself. Scheme as specified just isn't a big enough language, and if you pick one of the better implementations (e.g. Racket, which is awesome), then it's not really Scheme anymore (e.g. Racket, which is really its own language by now).