3 ms·
I would imagine that weakening a competitor in their space would be decently correlated with expected return for shareholders. Not sure where you got the idea
by wutbrodo 9y ago
I would imagine that weakening a competitor in their space would be decently correlated with expected return for shareholders. Not sure where you got the idea that the only benefit would be "personal".
- whack 9y agoSure, but I have a hard time imagining that "what happened to Levandowski and Kalanick", as individuals, is going to weaken Uber in the marketplace. If anything, going from Kalanick to Khosrowshahi might have actually helped Uber in the long run.
- kelnos 9y agoYeah, I agree with this. Both Levandowski and Kalanick seem to be incredibly toxic people; removing or lessening their influence on Uber, and replacing them with decent people, would only seem to strengthen Uber's position and reputation going forward.
- chrononaut 9y agoWhich interestingly circles back to another comment that was made: > a settlement that requires Uber to do very well to have any value.