4 ms·

> Spinlock fixes and support for Motorola 68K and 88K architectures I'm astounded that they support those architectures

• anarazel 9y ago
  > I'm astounded that they support those architectures I work on PG, and I'm regularly astounded too... As long as the compilers are new enough, the burden isn't too high though. Previously it prevented us from using atomics for some concurrency optimized things, but now we've an atomics implementation that, at compile time, falls back to a spinlock backed atomics implementation. Slightly complicated by the fact that we don't even have a hard dep on a spinlock implementation, falling back to semaphores :) Ah. Fun. But seriously, the thing that hurts more is that we only require a C89 compiler :/
  • pritambaral 9y ago
    > But seriously, the thing that hurts more is that we only require a C89 compiler :/ Indeed. For a glimpse for the non-PG-hackers (like me), there's an ongoing attempt discussed in the PG-hackers mailing list to use stdbool.h.
    • wahern 9y ago
      That can be tricky because you can't emulate the semantics of the C99 bool type. In C99 (bool)256 == 1 but on systems which emulate bool with, e.g., an 8-bit unsigned char then (bool)256 == 0
      • petereisentraut 9y ago
        Another problem is that the bool provided by stdbool.h is 4 bytes on some platforms, which breaks PostgreSQL all over the place.
• collyw 9y ago
  What uses those these days?