3 ms·
QUIC has already enough intelligent people behind it, I'll look at the github page to see if I can say something, but the main difference is probably the scope.
by Luker88 9y ago
QUIC has already enough intelligent people behind it, I'll look at the github page to see if I can say something, but the main difference is probably the scope.
The scope of QUIC is quite clear: it aims at putting together TCP and TLS. It already does that well enough, it won't do more. I found that limiting, the only option I have is to do something myself.
I tried talking to people around (conference and privately) but what I got from it is basically: first show that it can work, then we can talk. I tried to talk about the theory and objectives behind before the code, but without an implementation it does not seem to be worth much.
Google is a big company that can put people to work on something and that gets things done, wether it is a good idea or not. I can't pay anyone, I have not found people interested in even only the theory, so I'll go on, and maybe something will change when things start to work.
- euyyn 9y agoI encourage you to just enter the working group and engage them via whatever medium they're using. There's nothing to lose, really, and much potential win for both them and you.