4 ms·
Personally I'd like to see improved performence. I really don't see why a CPU core would have to be pegged at 100%. JMAP support would be nice too.
by robert_foss 9y ago
Personally I'd like to see improved performence. I really don't see why a CPU core would have to be pegged at 100%.
JMAP support would be nice too.
- ronjouch 9y agoHell yes, especially during Calendar syncs. Also: startup time. Currently, to reach a fully usable state, on my Linux SSD machine, - Firefox 59 needs 2s. - Thunderbird 59 needs 8s.
- WalterGR 9y agoHell yes, especially during Calendar syncs. Also: startup time. I completely agree. I have so many calendars that after launching Thunderbird, it takes around 3 minutes 30 seconds to become responsive to user input, pegging a CPU core the entire time. And when calendars sync while the app is running (which happens all at once rather than being staggered,) it becomes unresponsive for about a solid minute, again pegging a CPU.