It is very possible that Erlang could have a better way than Lisp, and that Lispers can't see it until they learn Erlang. Entirely possible. But an arbitrary

It is very possible that Erlang could have a better way than Lisp, and that Lispers can't see it until they learn Erlang. Entirely possible. But an arbitrary bug in an arbitrary Lisp program is nothing even remotely like sufficient proof for such a statement, unless you are trying to claim that Erlang programs are inherintly bug-free, regardless of how they were implemented...?