> Having political or cultural influence, or holding market dominance aren't crimes in a capitalist economy. Those aren't valid reasons to "regulate" the succes

> Having political or cultural influence, or holding market dominance aren't crimes in a capitalist economy. Those aren't valid reasons to "regulate" the success out of those companies. Capitalism isn't the only idea by which we run our society, nor is the market society's only priority. Also, we have experience with the pernicious effects of too much market dominance, which is why we developed antitrust law.