6 ms·
> There is not a really good, open source, Email client on mobile. I know that mobile is more than Android, but I find K-9 mail to be a really good, open sourc
by avian 9y ago
> There is not a really good, open source, Email client on mobile.
I know that mobile is more than Android, but I find K-9 mail to be a really good, open source, mobile mail client.
https://k9mail.github.io/ https://k9mail.github.io/
- arca_vorago 9y agoI'm the sort of person who lives on the cli, I've been considering trying to port some of my emacs/gnus setup to my android device. I wonder how well it would work?
- vidarh 9y agoCheck out Termux. I'm running Emacs on both my phone and tablet on occasion. https://wiki.termux.com/wiki/Main_Page https://wiki.termux.com/wiki/Main_Page
- bergie 9y agoNote: also works on new-ish Chromebooks (so you don't necessarily need to enable developer mode to work offline).
- megaman22 9y agoYou must hook a real keyboard up, right? I can't even imagine trying to run emacs on an on-screen touch keyboard.
- Fnoord 9y agoHacker Keyboard will allow you to achieve a lot. All, with all CLI programs? That I do not know. There is a learning curve either way. You can also SSH out of your machine with a terminal app (recommend to look into Mosh) if you got a good internet connection such as 4G/LTE or WiFi. Then you can run e.g. Mutt remotely. Use with tmux and never close it. As for hook up, there's BT and USB OTG.
- arca_vorago 9y agoBlackberry ftw ;)
- allan_s 9y ago+1 k9 is really good, I think it would be a pity to split thunderbird resource on mobile front, maybe they can share resource (low level protocol libraries?)/public relation (i.e mutual refering) so that they core developers can focus on what they're good at. My opinion is that developing an app for mobile and one for desktop is really two different set of skills and it's not because you've made an awesome desktop app that you will produce an awesome mobile app, vice-versa.
- robotmay 9y agoK9 is excellent, and has good PGP support as well. Been using it for the past two years without any trouble.
- teekert 9y agoIt's good, some options are placed at very counter intuitive places and it would be nice if they'd slap some material design on top of it. Other than that it's pretty nice indeed.
- pmontra 9y agoI also came here to write about K9. It's open source, it works well, it supports encryption (with the OpenKeychain app). I don't have much more to ask to it. I don't think it's worth investing on a mobile Thunderbird but to be fair, I'm pretty happy with desktop Thunderbird too. They could stay in maintenance mode and make sure that it keeps running on any new OS version it's released. If I can wish for something, fix this bug from 2009 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/381017 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/3... (but originally from 2007)
- avian 9y agoI have a similar sentiment towards Thunderbird. Every once in a while I try using other Linux desktop clients but I always go back to Thunderbird. Feature-wise I don't miss anything. My biggest problem are various long-standing bugs and occasional crashes. Each time it crashes I wonder whether that is something that might be exploitable by a specially-crafted email.
- Fnoord 9y agoFor me, Mailspring (successor of Nylas N1) works, but it does use Electron... (Therefore IMO not suitable for mobile, but I wasn't suggesting that either way.)
- lucideer 9y agoA big problem with K-9 (and open-source clients in general), is detailed in this thread: https://github.com/k9mail/k-9/issues/655 https://github.com/k9mail/k-9/issues/655 Unfortunately, this is not so much a problem with the quality of the client, but rather with the strangle-hold of big providers over the email system, but users will inevitably complain to the client developers about it.
- pmlnr 9y agoThis is a feature, not a bug. Google comes up with ideas, sure, that doesn't mean all projects have to support it. There is nothing wrong with SSL IMAP auth.
- Arnt 9y agoSSL IMAP auth prevents bystanders from watching the password. Google's auth goes further, the IMAP client doesn't have to store your password at all. Instead client stores an app-specific password-like string instead, one with limited rights), which is a big improvement IMNSHO.
- jimktrains2 9y agoWhich is different from XOAUTH2. The "less secure apps" listed in google still list ones using app-specific passwords.
- lucideer 9y agoIf you look at how, e.g. Fastmail solves this[0] (and other services do the same or similar), it's a nice example of something that's both secure and supports any client without requiring the client to do anything specific to their service. [0] https://www.fastmail.com/help/clients/apppassword.html?u=06984117 https://www.fastmail.com/help/clients/apppassword.html?u=069...
- cvwright 9y agoFrom the Github issue linked above, apparently Google supports something similar: https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/185833 https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/185833
- vog 9y agoK-9 mail is great, but just one part of the replacement. I've yet to find a very good contact list for Android. ... and a calendar that works remotely as good as the one of Thunderbird (Lightning).
- zmodem 9y ago+1 for K9. I wish it or something as good were available for iOS.
- zafiro17 9y agoYou've gotten a lot of recommendations for K9, which I also like. But I went with Aquamail on Android, which has worked really well for me and I'm very happy with it. Actively developed and maintained, and very slick interface.
- aw3c2 9y agoNon-free and thus irrelevant.
- nas 9y agoI'm a big supporter of open source software. However, I pay for a copy of Aquamail. I also paid for a version of K9, in order to support the developer. Aquamail is a good product and the developer is continuously improving it. I would hate to live in a world where your only options for email would be to use one of the big providers (gmail, office 365, etc). BTW, Aquamail is free, just not open source. The free version has a few limitations, I think, like a non-changeable signature.
- tatami 9y agoI had been using K9 since 2010 or so, since there were only few mail clients supporting multiple accounts, but I always found it rather confusing to navigate around. Especially the settings, there are Global settings, account settings, folder settings but didn't always show up in the menu.
- sametmax 9y agoThe ergnomics are terrible and the search engine is barely useful. It's still the lesser of all evils on mobile though.
- mordae 9y agoK-9 is slow and has an ancient UI. I hope that they will finish the rewrite to Material UI any time soon.
- JankySolutions 9y agoSince we're listing issues with K9: It's pretty easy to setup if you know what you're doing, but the lack of any sort of autoconfig for non-Gmail mail servers make it very difficult to give it to a normal user and have it just work. Thunderbird has a standard autoconfig file to do this, and there is an open issue on K9 to add support for the same format, but it's been open and stagnant for years[0] [0] https://github.com/k9mail/k-9/issues/865 https://github.com/k9mail/k-9/issues/865