> Before you reply that detectives might/would have done that anyways, the point is that at least that is identifiable and addressable I think you're handwavin

> Before you reply that detectives might/would have done that anyways, the point is that at least that is identifiable and addressable I think you're handwaving the difficulty of identifying and addressing bias and discrimination. I'm not sure it's any easier to do for people than for computers. Computers have a huge advantage here because we can open up their brain and examine how they think, and once we create one that suits our tastes, we can replicate it faithfully. Humans are much more of a black box than a neural net would ever be.