5 ms·

I mainly read the comments, rarely the articles themselves. (That's not to say that I don't read articles in general — I do, but I mostly find them via Twitter.

I mainly read the comments, rarely the articles themselves. (That's not to say that I don't read articles in general — I do, but I mostly find them via Twitter.) Usually, I'm much more interested in what the community has to say about a given topic or issue than I am about the object-level news.

jvzr 9y ago
Same. I use hckrnews.com to have an up-to-date list of recent topics discussed on HN, quickly skim it for headlines that stand out, but mostly focusing on highly-commented posts (50+ when in the morning, 20+ later on in the day), and I read comments first.
- sbmthakur 9y ago
  hckrnews.com looks cool. Thanks for sharing.
- piva00 9y ago
  Normally I don't do this but: third here, didn't expect it to be so common. Probably the difference for me is that I live in Europe so I tend to catch up to a bunch of posts from the evening/night in the US during my morning coffee and then open hckrnews.com again by the end of the afternoon when some new posts begin to crop up. I'll read the articles with interesting headlines but always jump to the comments first, some articles that I really think could help me in the future (or deserve further reading or research) I will save to my todo-list or in my Pocket account and then set a reminder to re-read/research in a given day when I'm free.
- galfarragem 9y ago
  I would also add: http://www.daemonology.net/hn-daily/ http://www.daemonology.net/hn-daily/ (HN daily top 10 links archived since 2010) https://hnews.xyz/ https://hnews.xyz/ (HN with thumbnails -> deeper HN skimming)
- tebugst 9y ago
  Woow. I too do the same. But I browse only 1st page in morning (30+) and later I went thr' other pages.
YouKnowBetter 9y ago
The quality of the comments might make me read the article, but that is 1 in 10. I admire the fast groups of subjectmatterexperts who will quickly prais or debunk the content of the articles and post links that are even more interesting. Further, I use https://theoldreader.com https://theoldreader.com to subscribe to the RSS feed, makes all my "monitoring" a lot easier.
craftyguy 9y ago
Reading other comments here, it seems that nearly all HN users read the comments and not the article. If no one is reading the actual article, then that means HN users are reacting to an article title and to each other (also reacting to an article title)?
- CM30 9y ago
  This seems to be a common thing with aggregators in general. As someone who's seen their work posted to Reddit and other sites (or has posted it there themselves), the aggregator topics seem to get a lot more views and comments than the source article does. I think in many cases, the system comes down to "upvote the topic and comment if I agree with the premise (or what seems to be it), or downvote the article and comment if I disagree with the premise (or what I think it seems to be)"
- lostmsu 9y ago
  It is not that simple. For one, I only put the first comment under an article after reading it. Which does not happen until I am interested in the topic. I mostly rely on top level commenters replying to the article content, often with quotes, and then go down into discussion from there.
- yehosef 9y ago
  This is because you are reading comments of people that write comments. People that write comments, (usually) read comments. There are lots of people that read comments that don't write comments and probably even more that don't read comments and click on the links. For the last group, the votes and number of comments are just signals for how good the link is - they don't care about the comments.
Toast_25 9y ago
The problem about this is that a LOT of users that seem knowledgeable pull shit out of their ass. I've seen this many times here: I read the article and then the comments and they just end up being elaborate bullshit based on a title and previous "knowledge" (often refuted by the article itself) rather than informed discussion.
- huehehue 9y ago
  This goes both ways. Articles aren't always 100% trustworthy either, and in that case a commenter might just as well offer a valid counterpoint or correction(s). As with anything, be reasonable. If you're really interested, then use whatever content is available to educate yourself, be it comments, the article itself, or independent research.
  - Toast_25 9y ago
    I agree, the cases that bother me are the ones where it's painfully obvious the commenter didn't read the article. I enjoy reading counterpoints and is one of the main reasons I read the comments.

jvzr 9y ago

Same. I use hckrnews.com to have an up-to-date list of recent topics discussed on HN, quickly skim it for headlines that stand out, but mostly focusing on highly-commented posts (50+ when in the morning, 20+ later on in the day), and I read comments first.

sbmthakur 9y ago
hckrnews.com looks cool. Thanks for sharing.
piva00 9y ago
Normally I don't do this but: third here, didn't expect it to be so common. Probably the difference for me is that I live in Europe so I tend to catch up to a bunch of posts from the evening/night in the US during my morning coffee and then open hckrnews.com again by the end of the afternoon when some new posts begin to crop up. I'll read the articles with interesting headlines but always jump to the comments first, some articles that I really think could help me in the future (or deserve further reading or research) I will save to my todo-list or in my Pocket account and then set a reminder to re-read/research in a given day when I'm free.
galfarragem 9y ago
I would also add: http://www.daemonology.net/hn-daily/ http://www.daemonology.net/hn-daily/ (HN daily top 10 links archived since 2010) https://hnews.xyz/ https://hnews.xyz/ (HN with thumbnails -> deeper HN skimming)
tebugst 9y ago
Woow. I too do the same. But I browse only 1st page in morning (30+) and later I went thr' other pages.

YouKnowBetter 9y ago

The quality of the comments might make me read the article, but that is 1 in 10. I admire the fast groups of subjectmatterexperts who will quickly prais or debunk the content of the articles and post links that are even more interesting. Further, I use https://theoldreader.com https://theoldreader.com to subscribe to the RSS feed, makes all my "monitoring" a lot easier.

craftyguy 9y ago

Reading other comments here, it seems that nearly all HN users read the comments and not the article. If no one is reading the actual article, then that means HN users are reacting to an article title and to each other (also reacting to an article title)?

CM30 9y ago
This seems to be a common thing with aggregators in general. As someone who's seen their work posted to Reddit and other sites (or has posted it there themselves), the aggregator topics seem to get a lot more views and comments than the source article does. I think in many cases, the system comes down to "upvote the topic and comment if I agree with the premise (or what seems to be it), or downvote the article and comment if I disagree with the premise (or what I think it seems to be)"
lostmsu 9y ago
It is not that simple. For one, I only put the first comment under an article after reading it. Which does not happen until I am interested in the topic. I mostly rely on top level commenters replying to the article content, often with quotes, and then go down into discussion from there.
yehosef 9y ago
This is because you are reading comments of people that write comments. People that write comments, (usually) read comments. There are lots of people that read comments that don't write comments and probably even more that don't read comments and click on the links. For the last group, the votes and number of comments are just signals for how good the link is - they don't care about the comments.

Toast_25 9y ago

The problem about this is that a LOT of users that seem knowledgeable pull shit out of their ass. I've seen this many times here: I read the article and then the comments and they just end up being elaborate bullshit based on a title and previous "knowledge" (often refuted by the article itself) rather than informed discussion.

huehehue 9y ago
This goes both ways. Articles aren't always 100% trustworthy either, and in that case a commenter might just as well offer a valid counterpoint or correction(s). As with anything, be reasonable. If you're really interested, then use whatever content is available to educate yourself, be it comments, the article itself, or independent research.
- Toast_25 9y ago
  I agree, the cases that bother me are the ones where it's painfully obvious the commenter didn't read the article. I enjoy reading counterpoints and is one of the main reasons I read the comments.