6 ms·
ClojureCL looks quite awesome, it looks like it takes all of the boiler plate out in comparison to C but I am very interested in the overhead. I tried aparapi f
by thebeardedone 9y ago
ClojureCL looks quite awesome, it looks like it takes all of the boiler plate out in comparison to C but I am very interested in the overhead. I tried aparapi for my bachelor thesis and for larger problems it seemed to have quite the overhead that the normal kernel did not have (several years ago). After watching your talk on youtube [1], I saw you compared the GPU implementation to the JVM and other CPU implementations in Clojure. Do you have any numbers for the same kernel being called from a native C openCL application?
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEOOYbscyTs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEOOYbscyTs
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- dragandj 9y agoFor equivalent code, you will not experience any noticeable difference compared to C. It is nothing like Aparapi.