4 ms·
I'm not sure I'd have made this particular blogger the target for my ire if it was my work, but in principle I agree with the penalty. Copyright sustains the pe
by Veen 9y ago
I'm not sure I'd have made this particular blogger the target for my ire if it was my work, but in principle I agree with the penalty. Copyright sustains the people who create the art that this blogger was curating. Without copyright, there would be nothing for him / her to curate in the first place because there would be no such thing as professional photographers, designers, or writers.
- singularity2001 9y agoI'd agree if the blogger made any money from it. Like this it is nuts!
- Veen 9y agoPeople don't usually make money from the art or the books they buy. If "making money" was the only condition on which the requirement to pay or give credit was predicated, there would be no photography industry. The creator has the right to license their work in any way they see fit. That work doesn't automatically become community property just because it's been published online.