I was speaking more to the resource utilization part of the statement, but sure: technically, there will probably still be humans left, in places, if we keep go

I was speaking more to the resource utilization part of the statement, but sure: technically, there will probably still be humans left, in places, if we keep going at the rate we are. If we're (as a species) lucky, that number might even exceed the minimum viable population. The individuals in that circumstance probably won't feel very lucky, though.