4 ms·
these two things are in such direct contradiction >systematic influences can easily cause such an effect >how this just goes to show that it's really the SYST
by mlevental 9y ago
these two things are in such direct contradiction
>systematic influences can easily cause such an effect
>how this just goes to show that it's really the SYSTEM that's biased
that i have no idea what you're really trying to say.
> Non-malicious
no one cares if it's malicious or benign. ask a black person whether they care about the intentions of those they're being racially profiled by (for example). it doesn't matter. what matters if systemic inequalities exist - and here is proof that they do.
- T2_t2 9y agoThis is either some next level trolling, or really odd. > The entire point of the paper is to show that you can observe a statistical anomaly like wage disparity whenever you compare two different populations, even when you essentially control for job effectiveness and isolate out any influence from malicious discrimination.
- mlevental 9y ago>statistical anomaly >systematic influences >bias in the results >SYSTEM that's biased you really don't see that who i'm responding to isn't at all consistent in what they're trying to say? the first 3 aren't mutually consistent and the fourth makes no sense when contextualized against those prior inconsistencies.