4 ms·
The story in not over yet. He should sell the rights of his story for a movie and make the 1.2m back, only this time, the legit way.
by sebastian 9y ago
The story in not over yet. He should sell the rights of his story for a movie and make the 1.2m back, only this time, the legit way.
- giarc 9y agoNot a lawyer here but would that fall under "profiting from the proceeds of crime"? This article from Australia suggests it's illegal in that country, I wonder if it's the same in the US. >Orders may also be made to seize the proceeds of the commercial exploitation of a person’s notoriety from criminal offending, literary or otherwise (but often described as “literary proceeds”). http://theconversation.com/explainer-how-proceeds-of-crime-law-works-in-australia-78600 http://theconversation.com/explainer-how-proceeds-of-crime-l...
- colejohnson66 9y agoOJ Simpson wrote “(If) I Did It” and made money off that
- totalZero 9y agoI believe he was taken to court by the father of Ron Goldman, who won rights to the book. I'm not too familiar with the circumstances arouns the case, though, so this doesn't necessarily refute the idea that OJ could potentially have profited.
- dagw 9y agoMy understanding was that Goldman initially won a lien on the profits from the book, since Simpson owed Goldman money from the civil suit, and later the Goldman's where handed the book rights by the bankruptcy courts, when OJ failed to pay his debts. So in theory OJ could have profited if he didn't also, independently, owe the Goldman's a lot of money.
- dagw 9y agoOfficially OJ Simpson never commit those crimes.
- justinlardinois 9y agoSome US states have laws like this, but they're usually limited to certain kinds of crimes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_Sam_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_Sam_law