2 ms·
While I agree with you, it's much more invasive than a superimposed face on a still image. A photograph of something is open to interpretation or dispute, but
by jstarfish 9y ago
While I agree with you, it's much more invasive than a superimposed face on a still image.
A photograph of something is open to interpretation or dispute, but a video is a series of such stills, each one slightly different, each of which adds to the provenance of the whole.
- jobigoud 9y agoBanning it doesn't make the underlying tech go away. You seem to imply a video is inherently more trustworthy, this is no longer the case, we need to acknowledge it.