This is a terrible article. It leads with social commentary about supposed healthy amounts of content, and then goes on to describe the shake-up at LA Times bec

This is a terrible article. It leads with social commentary about supposed healthy amounts of content, and then goes on to describe the shake-up at LA Times because the editor got pulled into the #metoo fiasco. Harvey Weinstein arguably produced some of the best content in Hollywood during his tenure, and so the two shouldn't be coupled. Yea, fire the dude and move on, but don't make this about cheap content, and don't make this also about the press failing to generate revenue. All very different things and misses the nuance of what is going on.