3 ms·

> And unless there was an analysis that confirmed the protocol's strength or the author is a recognized cryptographer, you cannot assume he did a good job. nor

• dozzie 9y ago
  It's a cryptographic product. You have to assume he did a bad job unless proven otherwise.
  • cat199 9y ago
    Assuming a bad job for auditing purposes is not anywhere near the same thing as making a direct assertion that the protocol is 'riddled with holes'