4 ms·
The linguistic components are a bit overblown, at least as far as extending into the past. Just English to reconstructed Proto-Germanic, dropping any PG endings
by jdmichal 9y ago
The linguistic components are a bit overblown, at least as far as extending into the past. Just English to reconstructed Proto-Germanic, dropping any PG endings, and glossing over things like long vowels:
one: /wʌn/ vs /ɑi̯n/
two: /tu/ vs /twɑi̯/
three: /θri/ vs /θri/
four: /fɔr/ vs /ɸeð.wɔr/
five: /faiv/ vs /ɸimɸ/
This is only to early AD times. Pushing back into Proto-Indo-European gets weirder; you lose Grimm's law. Considering I've had trouble asking for a "map" in a Spanish train station (/mæp/ vs /mapa/), I don't see these being anywhere close to understood.