4 ms·
Thanks, but we don't want another Google knowing and keeping all our data, even websites that we visit.
by bhnmmhmd 9y ago
Thanks, but we don't want another Google knowing and keeping all our data, even websites that we visit.
- Gudin 9y agoBy that logic, you would be using only Google+ and Allo for messaging.
- bhnmmhmd 9y agoI think I was clear about my logic: no more monopoly! Why would you think I'd have to use Allo and G+?
- r3bl 9y agoI think that because you've used "all my data", he implied that you should be using their social network and their instant messaging service, so that it would truly be "all the data". To me the spooky part is that he only thought of two use cases in which one is guaranteed that a random person is not using Google's services (at least, not exclusively).
- timdorr 9y agoAll of your data? At best, they know the URL of any pages where this widget is visible. Not all websites, and not even a large subset of that site's pages. This isn't like a Facebook share widget, which is usually so ubiquitous, they really can know all the sites you visit.
- rainbowmverse 9y agoThat's how every now-ubiquitous thing starts. It used to be other things. Most of them are gone now. Something will take the place of the Twitter and Facebook buttons some day.