4 ms·
RabbitMQ 2.0 is out includes paging messages on disk and support for AMQP 0-9-1
- rabbitmq 16y agoMore details here: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-announce/2010-August/000028.html http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-announce/2010-A... The new persister is going to help a LOT of people. Check it out!
- devinfoley 16y agoThank you so much! I have been waiting on this for months now, and I can't believe it's finally here!
- thezilch 16y agoFull release notes: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-announce/attachments/20100825/2c672695/attachment.txt http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-announce/attach...
- bluemoon 16y agonow only if it cooperated with STOMP better
- brianm 16y agoHmm, that might be fun to hack on... One problem will be that AMQp is much more complicated than Stomp, and exposes a set of primitives for which there is no good analogue in Stomp -- notably bindings and queues as first class, client manipulable, items. It should be possible to choose some reasonable behavior though and go with it. Ah, where is my copious free time!?
- revoltingx 16y agoRabbitMQ rocks, I've recently written a small tutorial on using their rabbitmq erlang client: http://developingthedream.blogspot.com/2010/08/setting-up-queue-consumer-with.html http://developingthedream.blogspot.com/2010/08/setting-up-qu...
- gkelly 16y agoDidn't a recent article on Varnish vs. Squid show that letting the kernel handle paging was a better method? Or is this not related?