2 ms·
> Wow, that's a nasty way to treat your citizens! How do you mean? If someone can't afford to pay, they need to seek help. Why should this suddenly become the
by dvfjsdhgfv 9y ago
> Wow, that's a nasty way to treat your citizens!
How do you mean?
If someone can't afford to pay, they need to seek help. Why should this suddenly become the problem of the owner of the building? Why should she be the person crediting another person? There are different ways to solve this problem and shifting it to the owner isn't the most fair one.
- thriftwy 9y agoThe assumption here is that a random tenant won't afford to pay for electricity. Which isn't a huge bill as bills go. I'm kind of shocked by a culture which assumes that kind of thing. Also, electricity is a kind of neccesity so cutting someone's electricity is a bit like leaving them endangered, which is arguably a crime. The owner of a building has to collect rent anyway, so I don't see why electricity would be an especial concern.