>Uh, if they catch up to my point, then they will still be useful at 5 - 7 years, thus the opposite of stagnant. I believe the GP meant that the rapid progress

>Uh, if they catch up to my point, then they will still be useful at 5 - 7 years, thus the opposite of stagnant. I believe the GP meant that the rapid progress of feature improvement will stagnate, which means older devices won't 'age' as quickly.