You said Bitcoin is valuable because it has use cases. I said it doesn't have use cases. That's an argument. As well, you're drawing a distinction between walki

You said Bitcoin is valuable because it has use cases. I said it doesn't have use cases. That's an argument. As well, you're drawing a distinction between walking up to a craps table and putting money on red and logging on to a brokerage account and putting money on penny stock XXX. I see those as the same things. You've also used a post hoc definition of investment, one where if the bet is good it's an investment. You've also deferred investment to mean any 'financial scheme' but never defined financial scheme. I take issue with all these things.