2 ms·
Thank you, i support this. I hadn’t noticed before but yeah, redundant. Its mildly infuriating, like DB schemas that are named something_schema. The object is
by banku_brougham 9y ago
Thank you, i support this. I hadn’t noticed before but yeah, redundant.
Its mildly infuriating, like DB schemas that are named something_schema. The object is a schema so using “schema” in the name is the first step into the inferno, in my view.
- yardie 9y agoI agree with the grammar as written. But when describing objects in a programming language isn't it better to add the type into the variable name? I've always found o_object, s_string, d_double to be quite common when working with ObjC examples. So often, that I assume it's best practice. When dealing with a wall of text it's not always obvious that a schema is a schema.