3 ms·
It's «Marmorkrebs» not »Marmokrebs». From Marmor -> Marble. Also, a simple Google/Wikipedia search should have been possible, dear NYT :( https://de.wikipedia.
by okket 9y ago
It's «Marmorkrebs» not »Marmokrebs». From Marmor -> Marble. Also, a simple Google/Wikipedia search should have been possible, dear NYT :(
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marmorkrebs https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marmorkrebs
- emmelaich 9y agoThe mistake might have come from this 2010 Scientific American article which uses the wrong spelling in the title. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/the-decade-the-clones-came-beware-the-mighty-marmokrebs/ https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/the-decade-t...
- sohkamyung 9y agoI've sent a tweet to the author and NYTimes about this. Hopefully they'll correct it.
- ComodoHacker 9y agoThey did.