3 ms·
In the hard sciences, you are absolutely right. In social sciences, I am not certain you are correct, there is at least a solid counterargument. All social sc
by timwiseman 16y ago
In the hard sciences, you are absolutely right.
In social sciences, I am not certain you are correct, there is at least a solid counterargument.
All social sciences are dealing with topics with numerous confounding variables that cannot be removed, and many others that they do not try to remove.Common sense on the other hand is the accumulation of your observations of humanity over a lifetime.
I think Mr. Grellas' statement may be too strong, the social sciences likely will eventually catch up to and surprass any individuals common sense in understanding humanity. But I think that day is a very long way away and it will likely include the subjective observations of trained and worldly observers like Desmond Morris even when it does arrive.
For the forseeable future, I suspect he is right and that the common sense of an observant and worldly person is a better predictor of human behavior than the formal social sciences.
- Xurinos 16y ago> Common sense on the other hand is the accumulation of your observations of humanity over a lifetime. There is no such thing as common sense, and it is anecdotal, at best. Now if the OP and a statistically significant number of people joined together to assert the same point about the specific society discussed, we may have something.
- TGJ 16y agoHow would you ever get a statistically significant number of people to agree on anything if each person relied on those sets of statistics to assert their point?