Personally, I think that having children is immoral. Yes, it can provide you with little workers to help you on the farm, and provide care and love for you in o

Personally, I think that having children is immoral. Yes, it can provide you with little workers to help you on the farm, and provide care and love for you in old age, but what if the child is born with a severe disability and is guaranteed to live a life of suffering? Not only will you experience some pain through their suffering, but you are literally wholly responsible for their life, which they had no consent in giving for their own birth. A happiness that is never experienced by an unborn child is neutral, while the suffering of a born child is negative. What is your opinion for how much a child can suffer before they should not have been born? How much happiness? For most lives there is a tradeoff between the two, so what is the tipping point where they should not have been born? Is it the point of suicide where not only do they not consent to being born, but the no longer consent to being alive?