3 ms·
Sounds like you used to assume that photographs were something they were not? "Faking it: Manipulated Photography Before Photoshop" https://books.google.com/b
by igouy 9y ago
Sounds like you used to assume that photographs were something they were not?
"Faking it: Manipulated Photography Before Photoshop"
https://books.google.com/books?id=nGvTg_HC32YC&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22faking+it%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwifvqa-rY_ZAhUKsFQKHSpBBCMQ6AEILTAB#v=onepage&q=%22faking%20it%22&f=false https://books.google.com/books?id=nGvTg_HC32YC&printsec=fron...
- pizza234 9y agoOh well, I'm not assuming that they weren't (I wrote equally "photoshopped", in proportion); also, I think it's a bit more complicated than a spectrum not retouched at all/complete fake. Specifically, my suspect is that easy of retouching has a snowball effect in the culture. By lowering the barrier to retouch, there will be a competitive incentive to be more and more aggressive with the tools. However, interesting book. I'd be curious to read what it says about Ansel Adams.
- igouy 9y ago"lowering the barrier" or building awareness among the audience that a photograph may not be what it seems at first glance.