> an image that was, at that point, a reality. Then they got to work in the darkroom. There were as many tricks in the darkroom as there are filters in Photos

> an image that was, at that point, a reality. Then they got to work in the darkroom. There were as many tricks in the darkroom as there are filters in Photoshop. Perhaps it's because the current generations of digital-only photographers don't realise so that they think old-school photography was absolutely 'honest'. For great example, search for the famous 'Concorde eclipse' photo. It was a 1974 composite of two original but separate photos.