I think it would really have to depend on what the tests were doing. If the tests were just goldbricking code testing random crap, yeah, 1:4 C:T is crazy. If yo

I think it would really have to depend on what the tests were doing. If the tests were just goldbricking code testing random crap, yeah, 1:4 C:T is crazy. If you really are validating functionality and business logic, is 1:4 C:T so crazy? I would feel a little more fearless about changing a system if the tests were that comprehensive.