4. The situation is completely artificial, to the extent that experimental partners are simulated and behave randomly. The conclusion could as well be that peop

4. The situation is completely artificial, to the extent that experimental partners are simulated and behave randomly. The conclusion could as well be that people don't like erratic behavior, even if the unpredictable behavior is do-goody. I can completely empathize with that: don't we all want to be able to depend on a colleague? To be sure that something that gets promised gets done and gets done well? Someone that behaves erratically is simply less trustworthy.