I don't get it. "Percentage of points coming from smashes" seems like a worthless metric for detecting cheating via favorable RNG seeds. The relevant metric wou

I don't get it. "Percentage of points coming from smashes" seems like a worthless metric for detecting cheating via favorable RNG seeds. The relevant metric would instead be average points per smash. And for that Mitchell's results are not particularly out of line with the other entries (the distribution is 464-511, with an average of 480; 491 doesn't look at all suspicious in that context). Wouldn't this rather be a sign of people making different strategic tradeoffs? Mitchell spent more time breaking barrels but at the cost of getting fewer bonus points for finishing the level in time.