The whole article is also interesting in that it is what happens when someone thinks only in "sociological" concepts such as role, class and distinction. For mo

The whole article is also interesting in that it is what happens when someone thinks only in "sociological" concepts such as role, class and distinction. For most, economic factors (so, scarcity) would be a very obvious explanation, but it does not even occur for the author. This is of course since such factors do not and can not occur in pure models of sociological structures. This delightful dialectic confusion, if you will, shows well how badly, or misleading, the proponents of general "facts" argue in the gender debate.