2 ms·
> Statements of fact with no supporting work are powerfully scary. You're arguing against a strawman. The post you're replying to didn't say anything about rem
by rlpb 9y ago
> Statements of fact with no supporting work are powerfully scary.
You're arguing against a strawman. The post you're replying to didn't say anything about removing the supporting work.
- mrkurt 9y agoThe implication is that a more thorough headline will tell you everything you need to know without having to read the article. Incidentally, I don't think posting to point out logical fallacies is all that useful. Feels great, adds nothing.