4 ms·
Now we are compiling (sorry transpiling). If we are going to do that why not use e.g. Go?
by JupiterMoon 9y ago
Now we are compiling (sorry transpiling). If we are going to do that why not use e.g. Go?
- jrs95 9y agoTechnically transpiling is just a more specific kind of compiling, so you’re not wrong in saying compiling.
- Franciscouzo 9y agoWhat's your point? All interpreted languages have to be compiled anyway, you have to create an AST, convert it to bytecode, and then interpret it or JIT it.
- Can_Not 9y agoIt takes 5 minutes to set that up. No reasonable person is going to switch languages for that reason.
- tiuPapa 9y agoBecause I want to use JS with types and compiler rather than runtime error? If you are using Go, why not use Rust?