4 ms·
Ah, this is a whole different matter. It's not about innovation but about "adoption of technology". I think it makes sense. If you and your competitors are sha
by nanairo 16y ago
Ah, this is a whole different matter. It's not about innovation but about "adoption of technology".
I think it makes sense. If you and your competitors are sharing all the supplies, then you can compete only by lowering prices and adopting new technologies faster than your opponent. Hence why they need to discount older products, and why 90% of the stock is sold in a month.
The same situation happens in the Android world too. Every couple of months a new mobile becomes the "leader" of the Android OS, the hardware to have.
Also PC manufacturers only adopt quickly those technologies that are obvious upgrades: a faster processor, more resolution, more memory, etc... But they are worried of adopting some more disruptive technology too quickly for fear that users may decide they prefer the old tech and hence they avoid their new models.
Not surprisingly then Apple is slow to update its lineup, but it's one of the fastest to adopt really new technologies: 3" floppy drive, USB, DisplayPort, trackpad, Wi-fi, etc...
- davidw 16y agoYeah, offhand, I think that Apple likely does 'innovate' a bit more, but that the PC companies are definitely better at getting newer, faster, better 'evolved' components in front of people faster and for less money.