4 ms·
And here's a paper claiming evidence against: http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/files/EarthSun.pdf http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/files/EarthSun.pdf (Another 30 second
by jcdreads 16y ago
And here's a paper claiming evidence against:
http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/files/EarthSun.pdf http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/files/EarthSun.pdf
(Another 30 seconds of googling.)
- ynniv 16y agoExcept that the current article suggests a cycle of 33 days which is not due to the Earth - Sun distance but hypothetically correlated to the face of the core of the Sun (which the article suggests has a period of 33 days compared to the 28 days of the surface of the sun). I don't mind that journalists don't publish your "30 seconds of Googling". Doing so would suggest that top Google hits are fact.